Results Measurement in PSD
Pressures to measure and report on the results of private sector development are growing rapidly and current PSD programmes are often not getting credit for what they are achieving. Recent efforts have now allowed developing some standards and useful tools in results measurement which you can find below. SDC puts increasing emphasis on result measurement in its private sector development projects. In May 2009, the E&I network organised a Seminar on “Making Markets Work for the Poor: Results Measurement in Private Sector Development – Current Practice and Challenges ahead” in Bern, Switzerland. The documentation of this event are very useful and they can be downloaded here. |
|
|
Your search "Category: PSD Result Measurement in PSD" resulted 9 Hits:
 |
International Finance Institutions and Development through the Private Sector September 2011 Author: A joint report of 31 multilateral and bilateral development finance institutions
|
 |
BMZ/ GIZ Conference "Systemic Approaches in Evaluation" (January 2011) January 2011 Author: Richard Hummelbrunner Keynote Address "Systems Thinking and Evaluation" including list of References. For the "Main Findings", "Panel Discussion" and more go directly to the website of the conference: www.evaluation-conference.de
|
 |
Why have a Standard for measuring results? Progress and plans of the Donor Committee for Enterprise 2011 Author: Jim Tanburn, Nabanita Sen
|
 |
New Version for Consultation of The DCED Standard for Measuring Achievements in Private Sector Devel January 2010 Author: DCED The DCED Standard for Measuring and Reporting Results has attracted much interest and feedback. Based on this feedback, the Standard has now been further enhanced and streamlined. This new version is now available for consultation. You are welcome to provide your feedback to the DCED!
|
 |
Quantifying Achievements in Private Sector Development - Implementation Guidelines July 2009 Author: Donor Committee for Enterprise Development (DCED) This provides practical guidelines to support projects to manage their results measurement process. It provides practical steps on: result chains, indicators, measurement of indicators, attribution and relating impact to programme costs.
|
 |
Monitoreo y evaluación de acciones de desarrollo orientadas al impacto July 2009 Author: Philippe de Rham, Lorena Mancero This guide developed by the knowledge management network ASOCAM gives methodological guidance on monitoring and evaluation (M&E)and presents a six-step tool for effective M&E.
|
 |
Quantifying Achievements in Private Sector Development - Control Points and Compliance Criteria April 2009 Author: Donor Committee for Enterprise Development / Jim Tanburn This document outlines key elements in a practical process of estimating results of PSD that can be managed by programmes internally. It is complemented by practical guidelines (see above). This methodology helps projects to make it easier to measure and report on their results; to work towards a shared understanding of reasonable quality in the estimation of results; to measure a very small number of “universal indicators”.
|
 |
Outcome Monitoring Concept SDC South Caucasus 2008 Author: Beka Tagauri and Harald Bekkers This outcome monitoring concept provides guidelines on 1) meausring in quantitative terms the aggregated outcome of Swiss interventions in the field of E&I, 2) assessing and describe in qulaitative terms the achievements of rural development projects applying the M4P approach. It provides tools on how to develop a log frames, result chains and outcome "calculations", or on how to do reporting when using the M4P approach
|
 |
PSD Reader 2008: Measuring and Reporting Results 2008 Author: Jim Tanburn, ITC ILO This reader offers a brief overview of current understanding in the field of result measurement, including particularly the terms, indicators and methodologies in use. Examples are given of impacts measured in a standard format, including for example cost per job created. Case studies of different projects are provided.
|
